DUI Police Mistakes
Reader’s Question:
I often wonder how police officers in Alaska work, especially in a DUI arrest. Does police officer also make mistakes during a DUI stop?
Frida
Anchorage, AK
The straight answer would be yes, police officers also make mistakes during a DUI stop or investigation. They actually have this “Training Manual” of rules that they should follow when they conduct field sobriety tests. Some DUI lawyers study this manual so they would know exactly what questions to ask the police officers to see if he completely followed the manual’s directions. This could be powerful evidence in a DUI case that is frequently overlooked by defense lawyers.
If the manual’s directions were not completely followed by the arresting officer, the validity of the tests can be attacked. A successful challenge often results in the exclusion of the test evidence at trial; and this would significantly weaken the prosecutor’s DUI case. There have already been reports that police officers do things inconsistent with the manual’s material and these have been found in extremely large number of DUI cases. Police officers also don’t always use objective scoring as explained in the manual. More often than not, officers just simply subjectively decide whether or not a person failed the tests.
How Reliable Are Alaska DUI Breath Tests
Reader’s Question:
I have heard a lot of stories questioning the reliability of a breath test in a DUI case. If I will be arrested for DUI in Alaska, how can the result of the breath test be excluded as evidence in a DUI case?
Brooke
Anchorage, AK
The use of the breath testing machines to obtain the blood alcohol content of a driver arrested for DUI has been widely criticized since law enforcement has employed the device in an effort to seek convictions for those suspected of DUI. Rationally, many safety standards have been put into place in order to attempt to minimize the number of innocent persons being convicted for DUI. So if you would be arrested for DUI in Alaska, there would be countless reasons that the court could rule to exclude ‘breath test evidence.’
It could be a ground for suppression of evidence if the breath test machine has not been calibrated because it needs to be regularly maintained and serviced to ensure accurate results. The breath test result could also be excluded if the police officer failed to observe the driver for a period of 20 minutes prior to administering the breath test. It would also constitute as a failure of legal procedure if the technician who performed the test is not properly certified and is not current with his/her educational requirements, thus breath test results should be excluded from the state’s evidence.